My biggest
issue with the Deerfield Massacre, as a non-fiction story, is the lack of dialogue.
While I can find plenty of information from many different sources, a lot of my
dialogue will be coming solely from Reverend John Williams in The Redeemed Captive.
To try and
solve this problem, I looked online in an attempt to find any other records
which may include quotes from other captors, and I was able to find mention of a
book. Captive Histories: English, French
and Native Narratives of the 1704 Deerfield Raid (Native Americans of the
Northeast: Culture, History & the Contemporary) of which is said to “draw
together an unusually rich body of original sources that tell the story of the
1704 French and Indian attack on Deerfield, Massachusetts, from different
vantage points.” as well as letters between the captives.
While this
book should be very helpful, there are no online copies, nor can I find it in
any local libraries. I was therefore forced to order the book but it has not
yet arrived. This could prove difficult if it doesn’t arrive with enough time
for me to analyse dialogue, and comparing captive stories to try and
work out the truth.
Gutkind
said, ‘Libel law requires writers to be
certain that what they write is true.’ But in a slight contradiction, he
added, ‘By contrast, you can pretty much
say what you want about dead people.’ Which makes me believe that, as long
as I state I am writing with presumption instead of solid fact, I can write as
I wish.
No comments:
Post a Comment